With the pre-release of Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown began, Ubisoft has chosen this week to rebrand its Ubisoft+ subscription companies, and introduce a PC model of the “Classics” tier at a lower cost. And an enormous a part of this, says the writer’s director of subscriptions, Philippe Tremblay, is getting gamers “comfortable” with not proudly owning their video games.
It’s laborious to maintain up with how typically Ubisoft has rebranded its on-line portals for its video games, with Uplay, Ubisoft Game Launcher, Ubisoft Connect, Uplay+, Uplay Passport, Ubisoft Club, and now Ubisoft+ Premium and Ubisoft+ Classics, all names used over the past decade or so. It’s additionally appeared faintly bewildering why there’s a requirement for any of them, given Ubisoft launched solely 5 non-mobile video games final yr.
However, a requirement there apparently is, says Tremblay in an interview with GI.biz. He claims the corporate’s subscription service had its greatest ever month October 2023, and that the service has had “millions” of subscribers, and “over half a billion hours” performed. Of course, numerous this might be a results of Ubisoft’s varied moments of refusing to launch video games to Steam, forcing PC gamers to make use of its companies, and certain choosing a month’s subscription relatively than the total value of the sport they had been seeking to purchase. But nonetheless, clearly persons are opting to make use of it.
But it stays unusual why sufficient individuals would need to subscribe—and at $17.99 a month it’s not low-cost—to a single writer’s output. That’s not a diss of Ubisoft’s video games—though you would possibly need to apply your individual—however one thing that will be as true had been it Activision Blizzard or EA.
You can subscribe to Game Pass, or PlayStation Plus, and get a broad vary of lots of of video games from dozens of publishers, or you’ll be able to pay considerably extra to solely get the video games made by one single writer, and certainly a writer with a really distinct model of sport. TV networks and film firms tried this, and people numbers are scaling down quick, with many already compromising by returning their reveals to the bigger streamers.
What’s extra chilling about all this, nevertheless, is when Tremblay strikes on to how Ubisoft needs to see a “consumer shift,” much like that of the marketplace for CDs and DVDs, the place individuals have moved over to Spotify and Netflix, as an alternative of shopping for bodily media to maintain on their very own cabinets. Given that most individuals, whereas being part of the issue (hey), additionally consider this as an issue, it’s so bizarre to see it phrased as if some defective pondering within the firm’s viewers.
One of the issues we noticed is that players are used to, somewhat bit like DVD, having and proudly owning their video games. That’s the patron shift that should occur. They received comfy not proudly owning their CD assortment or DVD assortment. That’s a metamorphosis that’s been a bit slower to occur [in games]. As players develop comfy in that facet… you don’t lose your progress. If you resume your sport at one other time, your progress file remains to be there. That’s not been deleted. You don’t lose what you’ve constructed within the sport or your engagement with the sport. So it’s about feeling comfy with not proudly owning your sport.
Tremblay goes on to say to GI.biz, “But as people embrace that model, they will see that these games will exist, the service will continue, and you’ll be able to access them when you feel like.” But…we all know that isn’t true! We know the way typically companies don’t proceed, what number of video games are not obtainable.
One of my all-time favourite video games was revealed by Ubisoft in 2003, referred to as In Memorium (Missing: Since January within the U.S.), and that’s actually not on its Classics vary, I’m positive as a result of the corporate way back misplaced any rights to it. Luckily for me, I personal a bodily copy of it. But any variety of different Ubisoft video games from the early ‘00s I stick in its Classics site have no results. There’s no purpose on Earth to assume the identical gained’t be true of Ubisoft’s present video games in 20 years.
There are nonetheless plans for Ubisoft so as to add streaming entry to Activision Blizzard’s video games to Ubisoft+, as weird as that will appear given the writer’s current acquisition by Microsoft. It’ll additionally appear pretty redundant, given all of the video games will come to the much more ubiquitous Game Pass, the place they gained’t be behind the technical hurdle of streaming. And certainly Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown is already obtainable to play by way of the Epic Games Store when you pre-ordered it there.
If, for no matter purpose, you simply adore Ubisoft’s output, then sure—for $17.99 a month you’ll be able to play Skull & Bones, Avatar, Assassin’s Creed Mirage, Anno 1800, and The Crew: Motorfest proper now, which is lots cheaper than shopping for all of them individually. But you gained’t personal any of them, and also you’ll must maintain paying that 18 bucks a month in perpetuity if you wish to maintain them, proper up till you’ll be able to’t any extra.
Discussion about this post