When the NBA initiated its new 65-game rule for gamers to qualify for common season accolades, the thought was to eradicate “load management” and the frequent “resting” of gamers.
However, when a participant reminiscent of Tyrese Haliburton misses time on account of a official harm, he stands to lose greater than $40 million for no fault of his personal. The flip facet of the rule that has many enraged.
Having missed 14 video games already, Haliburton can afford to take a seat out solely three extra video games to stay in competition for an All-NBA honor and the monetary bonuses that include it. The 23-year-old inked a five-year contract extension final July with a base worth of $204.5 million that could enhance to greater than $245 million – offered he makes an All-NBA staff or wins Defensive Player of the Year.
Speaking with The Athletic, Haliburton did not mince phrases on a ruling that could damage his pocket.
“I think it’s a stupid rule, like plenty of the guys in the league, but this is what the owners want, so as players, we gotta do our job and play in 65 games if we’re able to,” Haliburton mentioned. “So, that’s what I gotta do, take care of my body to be able to play in those games, and I think you’re seeing other players in the league kind of face the same thing. As long as the owners are happy.”
Haliburton is not alone in voicing his displeasure over the 65-game rule. On Tuesday’s “Inside the NBA” on TNT, Vince Carter, Candice Parker and Jamal Crawford questioned if the league wanted to revisit the brand new ruling. While Crawford opined gamers should not must “risk their livelihood” simply to satisfy a quota, Parker lamented that gamers stand to “lose real money” over one thing out of their management.
Discussion about this post