It was certainly one of the extra surreal contract negotiations in N.F.L. historical past. At the begin of coaching camp in July 1971, Joe Kapp, the New England Patriots’ star quarterback, was locked in an workplace with Upton Bell, the crew’s new basic supervisor, and Billy Sullivan, its principal proprietor.
Kapp had already agreed to a three-year deal price about $500,000 that started the earlier season. All Sullivan wanted was for Kapp to signal the customary participant contract used all through the league to interchange the “memorandum of agreement” he had initially signed. Kapp refused, saying the customary contract restricted his choices for shifting to a different membership as soon as his three-year deal expired.
With the media assembled exterior, Sullivan pleaded with Kapp to signal for 20 minutes. Kapp stood agency.
“All he had to do was sign the contract and he could still say the N.F.L. is a monopoly, but he threw it away,” Bell mentioned. “It was like the gunfight at the O.K. Corral.”
Sullivan gave up and escorted Kapp, steely eyed and resolute, out of the constructing. He even carried Kapp’s luggage. The Patriots misplaced their quarterback and Kapp by no means performed in the N.F.L. once more, forfeiting a whole lot of 1000’s of {dollars}.
But Kapp, who died this week at 85, stored combating. He efficiently sued the N.F.L. for violating antitrust legal guidelines defending gamers’ rights. He by no means obtained any monetary damages, however the authorized precedent in his case paved the approach for full free company, which the gamers gained 20 years later, changing the modified free company that required groups to be compensated for the lack of gamers.
“You can trace the ultimate achievement of free agency back to Kapp,” mentioned Jeffrey Kessler, certainly one of the attorneys who helped the N.F.L. gamers win a case named for working again Freeman McNeil in 1992 that ushered in full free company.
Kessler mentioned that he relied closely on the Kapp determination and precedents set in earlier circumstances introduced by Jim Smith and John Mackey. Smith, who glided by the nickname Yazoo, gained a swimsuit he introduced towards the league in 1970, which argued that the N.F.L. draft unreasonably restricted his proper to barter immediately with groups. (The N.F.L. Players Association sanctioned the draft in the 1977 collective bargaining settlement.) Mackey’s 1975 lawsuit efficiently challenged the so-called Rozelle rule, which obligated groups that signed free brokers to compensate these gamers’ former golf equipment, as unfairly limiting a participant’s freedom to discover a new crew.
While the three circumstances turned ammunition in the gamers’ authorized battles with the N.F.L., Kapp’s was the most curious. A sturdy quarterback from Cal who was unafraid to cost headfirst into defenders, Kapp was chosen in the 18th spherical of the 1959 draft by the Washington franchise. The crew by no means contacted him, although, so he went to the Canadian Football League, the place he performed for eight seasons.
In 1967, Kapp joined the Minnesota Vikings, then coached by Bud Grant, one other C.F.L. veteran. In his third season, Kapp led the Vikings to Super Bowl IV, the place they misplaced to the Kansas City Chiefs.
His three-year take care of Minnesota over, Kapp turned down the crew’s new three-year, $100,000-per-year supply. Aware of Kapp’s accidents and inconsistent passing, the Vikings launched him.
“Joe Kapp wasn’t the prettiest passer, but he was a vocal guy in the locker room,” mentioned Joe Horrigan, retired govt director of the Pro Football Hall of Fame. “The truth was, he was at the end of his career. He was kept together with chewing gum and staples.”
The Vikings nonetheless managed rights to Kapp’s companies and, in October 1970, traded him to the woeful Patriots in return for John Charles, a cornerback, and a first-round choose in the 1972 draft. Kapp signed a private companies contract that paid him about $500,000 and was a much less restrictive bridge between the Vikings and Patriots offers, Horrigan mentioned.
The league requested Sullivan to have Kapp to signal an ordinary contract, however the Patriots proprietor stored placing it off. Sullivan was smitten with Kapp’s superstar regardless of the quarterback having helped lead the crew to a 2-12 file after the commerce.
Kapp, below the recommendation of John Elliot Cook, his lawyer and agent, refused to signal an ordinary contract and, with out one, needed to depart coaching camp in summer time 1971. That led to the remaining, ill-fated assembly in Bell’s workplace.
A federal decide in Northern California who heard Kapp’s first case discovered that the draft and the Rozelle rule have been “patently unreasonable and illegal.” A jury in a subsequent case discovered that Kapp didn’t deserve damages from the Patriots or the N.F.L., creating one thing of a Pyrrhic victory.
The lawyer defending the league in the case was future N.F.L. Commissioner Paul Tagliabue.
Still, the ruling was a victory for the gamers, mentioned Michael LeRoy, who teaches sports activities labor legislation at the University of Illinois, as a result of the union and the league at the time “were fighting to determine the ill-defined boundary between collective bargaining and antitrust law.”
The Kapp case, he mentioned, “helped define what anti-competitive practices a league could impose.”
It took about two extra many years and plenty of extra battles for the gamers’ union to win free company, partly due to the value of defending the league’s appeals of the circumstances introduced by Kapp and others. By the Eighties, although, the gamers’ union had constructed up a conflict chest with cash earned from promoting their licensing rights, and it could go on to spend about $25 million to battle two key lawsuits in the late ’80s and early ’90s that led to trendy free company.
“He showed everyone the way and was a trailblazer, and we owed him a debt of gratitude, but he also showed us what not to do in terms of legal strategy,” mentioned Doug Allen, a former N.F.L. participant who helped run the gamers’ union from the ’80s by means of the early aughts. “Kapp ran out of resources to appeal his case. The lesson learned wasn’t ‘don’t sue the N.F.L.,’ the lesson was ‘don’t do it alone.’”
Like Curt Flood, who challenged Major League Baseball’s antitrust exemption, Kapp is remembered for his dangerous stand. He obtained no compensation and by no means performed one other down in the N.F.L., however his efforts didn’t go unnoticed.
“He instilled that fight in the players,” Kessler mentioned.
Discussion about this post