As Ron DeSantis has made assaults on The Walt Disney Co. a characteristic of his presidential marketing campaign, CEO Bob Iger responded to one of many Florida governor’s accusations made on the marketing campaign path: That the corporate was in favor of the “sexualization of our children.”
“We are a pre-eminent entertainer in the world, and we are proud of our track record there. The notion that Disney is in any way sexualizing our children quite frankly is preposterous and inaccurate,” Iger advised CNBC’s David Faber in an interview from Sun Valley, ID.
DeSantis has targeted his assaults on Disney’s opposition to a parental rights invoice — dubbed “don’t say gay” by detractors — that has led to a stand off and a federal court docket lawsuit. He’s additionally accused Disney of being a “woke corporation” and, per The New York Times, mentioned that the corporate has “really embraced the idea of getting the sexualized content in the programming for the young kids.”
While Iger advised Faber that “the last thing that I want for the company is for the company to be drawn in to any culture wars,” DeSantis is likely to continue his assaults, which burnish his picture as he runs to the suitable of Republican entrance runner Donald Trump.
In the CNBC interview, Faber pressed Iger on an incident that occurred in June, when there was a Neo-Nazi demonstration outdoors of Walt Disney World.
“It was horrifying, quite frankly, and it’s concerning to me that anyone would encourage a level of intolerance or even hate that frankly could even become dangerous action. It could be turned into some dangerous act of some sort,” Iger mentioned. “So it is concerning to me.”
Disney sued DeSantis in April, claiming that the governor’s transfer to strip the corporate of management over a particular district that covers its Florida theme parks was an act of retaliation for its opposition to the “don’t say gay” invoice. Also named as defendants within the lawsuit are the board members that DeSantis chosen to supervise the particular district, changing these aligned with the corporate.
“We are concerned that he has decided to retaliate against the company for a position the company took on pending legislation in that state,” Iger mentioned. “And frankly, the company was within its right, even though I’m not sure it was handled very well, it was within its right to speak out on an issue, a constitutionally protected right to free speech, and to retaliate against the company in a way that could be harmful to the business was not something we could sit back and tolerate.”
The five-member board of the particular district filed its personal counter-suit towards Disney in state court docket.
Discussion about this post