For years, followers have puzzled who Mr ‘So Vain’ is in Carly Simon’s hit ’70s breakup song.
So might you consider that Warren Beatty is the star that’s “so vain” he thinks the song is about him?
Beatty has only in the near past fallen into controversy after he was accused of an alleged historic sexual abuse incident in opposition to a baby throughout the ’70s, which he has, on the time of publishing, not addressed publicly. Simon has no connection to this incident. You can learn more right here.
Nevertheless, after releasing You’re So Vain again in 1972, Carly Simon shot to fame.
And for the 50 years since, (it is the song’s fiftieth anniversary this yr), she’s been constantly requested who is the person on the centre of the song.
Beatty, now 85, has been essentially the most possible contender, after Simon launched a new model of the song a yr later, that featured a back-masked whisper.
Fans have been certain that the title they heard whispered on the brand new model was “Warren”.
But over time, Simon hasn’t carried out a lot to assist her followers with their problem-solving.
In a 1983 interview with The Washington Post she mentioned, “It certainly sounds like it was about Warren Beatty.
“He definitely thought it was about him – he known as me and mentioned, ‘Thanks for the song.'”
Then in 2015, Simon admitted the second verse was about Beatty.
“You had me a number of years in the past after I was nonetheless fairly naïve / Well you mentioned that we made such a fairly pair / And that you’ll by no means depart / But you gave away the stuff you cherished and considered one of them was me,” the verse reads.
The pair were reportedly linked in the early ’70s.
But Simon also told People Magazine, “that doesn’t suggest the opposite two verses are additionally Warren”.
Later in life, Simon revealed that her No. 1 hit is truly about three males, together with Beatty. She hasn’t named the others.
Simon was beforehand married to James Taylor, and has been linked to Mick Jagger, Kris Kristofferson, Jack Nicholson and Cat Stevens.
Discussion about this post