Christina Ricci is not happy that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences is reviewing Andrea Riseborough’s Best Actress nomination.
The Yellowjackets star took to Instagram on Friday to put up a press release which has since been deleted, Deadline reported. In the assertion, Ricci lashed out on the Academy’s announcement that they’d be reviewing Riseborough’s Academy Award nomination for the indie movie To Leslie, by which the British actress portrays a Texas lady who squanders her lottery winnings whereas coping with alcoholism. Riseborough’s nomination adopted a word-of-mouth marketing campaign by which her movie star friends publicly praised her efficiency, an method the Academy is now second-guessing.
Ricci, for one, is standing by Riseborough and the grassroots marketing campaign that acquired her award season buzz.
“Seems hilarious that the ‘surprise nomination’ (meaning tons of money wasn’t spent to position this actress) of a legitimately brilliant performance is being met with an investigation,” Ricci wrote. “So it’s only the films and actors that can afford the campaigns that deserve recognition? Feels elitist and exclusive and frankly very backward to me.”
Ricci continued, noting that Riseborough herself had “nothing to do with the campaigning” for the nomination. However transferring ahead, “now her nomination will be tainted by this.”
“If it’s taken away shame on them,” Ricci closed out her now-deleted put up.
Last week, the Academy confirmed that it will likely be “conducting a review of the campaign procedures around this year’s nominees.” However, they didn’t identify To Leslie particularly. Instead, they said they’re working to “ensure that the Awards competition is conducted in a fair and ethical manner.”
“We are committed to ensuring an inclusive awards process,” the assertion learn. “We are conducting a review of the campaign procedures around this year’s nominees, to ensure that no guidelines were violated, and to inform us whether changes to the guidelines may be needed in a new era of social media and digital communication. We have confidence in the integrity of our nomination and voting procedures, and support genuine grassroots campaigns for outstanding performances.”
The energetic assist for To Leslie on social media from stars like Kate Winslet, Edward Norton and Gwyneth Paltrow seems to be the trigger for the nod to endure review, which some questioned as doubtlessly “illegal.” The review is supposed to decide whether or not the nomination violated present guidelines in opposition to lobbying for votes, Yahoo Entertainment beforehand reported.
The grassroots marketing campaign to rating Riseborough a nomination is claimed to have “seemingly pushed out” two actresses of coloration from scoring the nomination: Viola Davis for The Woman King, and Danielle Deadwyler for Till. Both stars “were backed by well-funded campaigns by Sony and MGM/Amazon, respectively, and were widely predicted to score honors, yet presumably do not have access to a network of powerful (and, let’s be honest, white) friends in the Academy to campaign for Oscars on their behalf,” Puck author Matt Belloni famous.
AMPAS’s board of governors will meet on Tuesday, Jan. 31 to focus on the difficulty.
Riseborough initially stated she was “astounded” to obtain the nomination, Deadline reported following the announcement of the Oscar nominations.
“It’s such an unexpected ray of light. It was so hard to believe it might ever happen because we really hadn’t been in the running for anything else,” Riseborough stated. “Even though we had a lot of support, the idea it might actually happen seemed so far away.”
Discussion about this post