Just this Monday, social studying web site Goodreads launched an announcement saying their dedication to making sure that the guide opinions left by members of the location observe their tips by being related to the guide, not harassing readers or authors, and never trying to deflate or inflate the ranking of a guide unfairly.
They checklist a operate they carried out earlier this 12 months that tries to bypass “review bombing,” which is basically when individuals go away damaging opinions for a guide with the intent to drop its ranking. This is finished with out truly having learn the guide. To do that, Goodreads mentioned it might quickly restrict scores being submitted for books throughout occasions when exercise for that guide is unusually excessive.
“Goodreads has an obligation to defend the freedom to read and prevent practices on its platform that detract from reasoned literary discourse and pave the way for books to be disappeared before their authors and ideas even get a hearing.”
Suzanne Nossel , CEO of PEN America
Nonprofit literary group PEN America applauded the choice, with CEO Suzanne Nossel saying, “We are gratified that Goodreads has taken steps to implement one of the crucial recommendations in our recent Booklash report, aimed at preventing reviewers who may not even have read a book from waging online campaigns to sink it. As a prominent platform for book discovery, Goodreads has an obligation to defend the freedom to read and prevent practices on its platform that detract from reasoned literary discourse and pave the way for books to be disappeared before their authors and ideas even get a hearing.”
In the announcement, Goodreads reported that its customers posted 26 million guide opinions and 300 million scores to the location throughout the final 12 months — its influence on the guide world cannot be overstated.
Find extra information and tales of curiosity from the guide world in Breaking in Books.
Discussion about this post