‘Guardians Vol. 3’ First Reviews Say It’s a Fitting Farewell

Whether we wish to or not, it’s time to say goodbye to the Guardians of the Galaxy.

Writer/director James Gunn has promised that Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 would be the farewell for this iteration of the Marvel workforce. (And Gunn himself is saying goodbye too; he’s off to run DC and make a Superman film.) Before he joins the Distinguished Competition, Gunn wrote and directed this third Guardians, reuniting Star-Lord, Drax, Gamora, Rocket, Nebula, Kraglin, and Groot for a high-stakes battle with the High Evolutionary (performed by Chukwudi Iwuji), a mad genius intent on — what else? — reshaping the universe in his personal picture.

So does this Guardians stay as much as the earlier two? Generally, the primary reactions to the films out of early screenings are very constructive, with some calling it the very best Marvel film in years. (Although with the competitors currently, that’s not essentially the most important praise on the earth.) Still, most reactions heap a ton of reward on the movie and on Gunn’s work. A couple of, nevertheless, did name it “uneven” and the weakest movie within the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy, due partially to a considerably underwhelming villain.

Here’s a pattern of the Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 critiques to date:

READ MORE: Every Marvel Phase Four Movie and Show Ranked

Here is the movie’s official synopsis:

In Marvel Studios’ “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3” our beloved band of misfits are settling into life on Knowhere. But it isn’t lengthy earlier than their lives are upended by the echoes of Rocket’s turbulent previous. Peter Quill, nonetheless reeling from the lack of Gamora, should rally his workforce round him on a harmful mission to avoid wasting Rocket’s life—a mission that, if not accomplished efficiently, might fairly probably result in the tip of the Guardians as we all know them.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 opens in theaters on May 5.