Gwyneth Paltrow ski collision trial: Terry Sanderson could launch attraction, source claims

Gwyneth Paltrow‘s authorized woes over a 2016 Utah ski collision could not fairly be over simply but.

On Friday, an eight-person jury determined Paltrow was not at fault for the crash, assigning 100 per cent of the blame to 75-year-old retired optometrist Terry Sanderson, and awarding her the requested $US1 (approx. $1.50) sum she sued over.

Now, nonetheless, Sanderson – who claimed Paltrow prompted the collision, which he alleges left him with mind injury – could also be planning an attraction, in line with his lawyer.

Watch the video above.

Gwyneth Paltrow received the civil declare towards her, with a jury discovering she was not chargeable for a 2016 Utah ski collision. (Getty)

Gwyneth Paltrow and Terry Sanderson — After the decision was delivered, she allegedly whispered to Terry Sanderson, the person who sued her: ‘I want you effectively’. (Getty)

READ MORE: ‘Overjoyed’ Big Bang Theory star welcomes her first little one

Lawyer Robert Sykes informed TMZ on Saturday that his shopper is contemplating all choices, together with doubtlessly submitting a movement to the court docket for a brand new trial or doable attraction.

Sykes claimed to the outlet that he believes errors had been made throughout the eight-day trial, and these perceived errors could kind the idea of an attraction.

In 2019, Sanderson sued Paltrow for $USD3.1 million (approx. $4.6 million) in damages, and after a choose dismissed the grievance, he sued the 50-year-old Shakespeare in Love actress once more, this time for $US300,000 (approx. $450,000).

Paltrow countersued for a symbolic $US1 (approx. $1.50) in damages, plus her authorized charges. Ultimately, she received, with the jury discovering within the widely-watched civil case that the Oscar-winner was not chargeable for the collision.

READ MORE: ‘I’m feeling a bit sick’: Inside essentially the most awkward Aussie TV second of all time

Terry Sanderson — Sanderson, who additionally took to the stand throughout the trial, reportedly mentioned outdoors the courtroom that suing a star was not value it. (AP)

READ MORE: How an enormous mortgage, an deserted manufacturing unit and a dream spurred man’s multi-billion-dollar empire

Sykes’ feedback come after Sanderson himself admitted the spectacle of suing a star was “absolutely not” value it.

Speaking with reporters outdoors the courtroom on Friday, Sanderson mentioned he was “very disappointed” within the trial’s consequence, and mentioned the trial, which noticed his medical historical past uncovered and emotional testimony from his ex-girlfriend and daughters, was “absolutely not” definitely worth the problem.

“Knowing that now, no,” Sanderson mentioned of the viral trial and his personal particulars being made public, in line with Extra. “I joked about dating sites, right? It’s like, I’m gonna be on the internet forever.”

During the trial, Sanderson mentioned on the stand: “Well I can never go on another dating site again. … It’s the pain of trying to sue a celebrity.”

Paltrow, in the meantime, opted to not communicate outdoors the courtroom, however launched a press release following the decision.

”I felt that acquiescing to a false claim comprised my integrity,” Paltrow’s assertion learn.

“I am pleased with the outcome and I appreciate all of the hard work of Judge Holmberg and the jury, and thank them for their thoughtfulness in handling this case.”

For a every day dose of 9Honey, subscribe to our publication right here