Henry Cavill apparently may’ve had the position of James Bond locked up within the 2000s — and he would’ve gotten away with it too … if it wasn’t for that meddling Daniel Craig.
This revelation was made courtesy of Martin Campbell — the director of “Casino Royale,” which was the primary new Bond film to characteristic DC post-Pierce Brosnan. According to him, not solely did Henry throw his hat within the ring for the coveted position … however he was an actual contender.
Here’s what Campbell needed to say about HC’s audition manner again when … “He looked great in the audition. His acting was tremendous. And look, if Daniel didn’t exist Henry would have made an excellent Bond.”
Campbell provides, “He looked terrific, he was in great physical shape … very handsome, very chiseled. He just looked a little young at that time back then.”
Now, whereas Campbell notes that Henry wasn’t his private favourite on the day trip of the ultimate group being thought-about — he nonetheless concedes … the dude definitely may’ve completed it. Unfortunately, Craig rolled by means of and gave it a shot — and ended up touchdown the gig.
Now on the prospect of Henry doubtlessly circling again and snagging the position of 007 now, Campbell addresses what most everybody else has mentioned about HC at this level … particularly, he is kinda thought-about a geyser by Hollywood requirements, particularly for a multi-year dedication.
He explains that Craig spent decade-plus taking part in Bond — and that form of time may begin to change into noticeable on an actor like Henry, who’s already in his 40s. MC continues … “Henry’s 40, so by the time he’s done the third one he’s going to be 50 and anything beyond that’s two, three years per Bond. He’s in good shape Henry, he’s a good guy.”
As for Henry … he is mentioned he’d be right down to do it even now. And after all the pieces at DC, we’re positive an opportunity like that would definitely be appreciated by him. We’ll see what they do!
Discussion about this post