Robert De Niro confronted the courtroom and his former assistant, Graham Chase Robinson, on October 30, 2023, in a trial that has raised questions on gender discrimination and office ethics.
What is Robert De Niro’s case about?
After a decade of service at Canal Productions, Graham ended her tenure, which led Robert and the corporate to file a lawsuit for $6 million, accusing her of misusing firm funds and indulging in private pleasures, like binge-watching Netflix, on the job.
In a dramatic twist, Graham countered with gender discrimination accusations, insisting Robert subjected her to sexist feedback and paid her lower than her male colleagues.
Robert De Niro’s trial claims
At the center of the trial are the narratives from each events. Robert’s testimony centered on the extent of Graham’s position inside Canal Productions.
“She did something and the whole lot inside the confines of her job,” he stated, pushing back against any suggestion of Graham overstepping into his personal life.
Despite the tension, Robert conceded that Graham excelled in certain tasks, saying: “The playing cards have been one of many few issues she was excellent at.”
Graham’s attorney, Andrew Macurdy, probed Robert on the variety of tasks assigned to Graham, which included personal errands and chores for Robert’s girlfriend, Tiffany Chen.
In these instances, Robert was unwavering, explaining that he and Tiffany “work collectively.”
Graham Chase Robinson’s counter-lawsuit
Graham’s allegations paint a distinct image, claiming Robert engaged in habits that belittled and demeaned her.
“De Niro directed sexist comments and conduct at her,” her attorneys from Sanford Heisler Sharp launched in a press release.
The protection hinged on a sequence of claims that Robert’s girlfriend, Tiffany, “falsely accused Robinson of being in love with De Niro.”
Graham’s authorized crew posited that these accusations led to retaliatory actions from Robert, which they argue pressured her into resignation.
The proof and allegations
The trial guarantees to delve into the communications between Robert, Graham, and Tiffany, together with one textual content message the place Robert labeled Graham “a nasty b—-.” Another textual content from Tiffany talked about Graham’s “demented imaginary intimacy.”
Addressing the jury, Brent Hannafan from Graham’s authorized crew expressed confidence within the readability of the proof, asserting: “We believe when all the testimony has been heard, the jury will agree with us that De Niro discriminated and retaliated against Ms. Robinson.”
Robert’s lawyer, Rich Schoenstein, maintains that the conflict “had nothing to do with gender, the whole lot to do with conduct.”
The emails and texts
Throughout the proceedings, the courtroom scrutinized varied emails and texts, a few of which Robert now admits might make clear Graham’s alleged emotions for him. “I was shocked by that, but now looking back, she might’ve been onto something,” he acknowledged on the stand.
Graham’s constant communication, even during off-hours, was put under the microscope. Robert argued against any notion of impropriety: “You’re making it out like I controlled her.” He emphasised his precept of belief, stressing, “I only value work if it is done right, or else it reflects poorly on me.”
Contentious interactions
In one revealing trade, Robert was questioned about requests he made for back-scratching, to which he responded, “Yeah, fine, I berated her,” admitting to the act but additionally downplaying it as rare and respectful.
The contested use of SkyMiles additionally grew to become a focus, with Robert expressing his intention for the miles: “I wanted those SkyMiles to be able to be used by my kids.”
Get the lowdown on the largest, hottest superstar information, options and profiles popping out of the U.S. Sign as much as our HELLO! Hollywood publication and get them delivered straight to your inbox.
Discussion about this post