It seems that a few of the feedback made by DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran throughout their huge DC movie slate announcement occasion didn’t go over very effectively with Warner Bros.
One of the feedback that got here from Gunn concerned Henry Cavill. In that remark, he stated: “For me, for this story, it isn’t Henry. I like Henry. He’s a great guy. I think he’s gotten dicked around by a lot of people, including former regimes of this company. But this Superman isn’t Henry for a number of reasons.”
Gunn additionally talked concerning the f**ked up previous of DC movies, saying: “As everyone here probably knows, the history of DC is pretty messed up, it was f**ked up. No one was minding the mint. They were just giving away IP like they were party favors to any creators that smiled at them.”
Then there are the feedback made by Safran involving the canceled Batgirl film, when he stated: “But that film was not releasable, and it happens sometimes. That film was not releasable… It would have hurt DC. It would have hurt those people involved.”
According to THR, these feedback “were not exactly tactful” and “there’s been quite a few ruffled feathers” from them. It seems that the “previous regime” which might be talked about, are literally a few of the similar people who find themselves at present nonetheless serving to run issues at Warner Bros.
As you’ve seen, Gunn and Safran don’t actually filter what’s on their minds and Gunn has stated that he needs to be open and trustworthy with everybody as they transfer ahead with their DC film plans. Sometimes the reality hurts! You’d suppose these studio executives would have thicker pores and skin. I imply, Gunn isn’t flawed.
Discussion about this post