TMZ.com
San Francisco is heading down a harmful, slippery slope with its proposal to deploy robots that may use deadly drive … that is based on the President of town’s board of supervisors.
Shamann Walton joined us Friday on “TMZ Live,” and ran down a checklist of the way he feels the armed police robots might backfire, and he says hacking is a large concern.
In case you missed it, San Fran’s board of supervisors permitted the robots in an 8-3 vote … with Shamann being one of many few opposing. After the approval, he stated voting towards the coverage did not make him anti-cop, simply pro-people of coloration.
Critics are involved harmless POC may very well be disproportionately harmed when these robots are deployed at metropolis crime scenes.
To be clear, San Fran’s not speaking about “Robocop”-like androids — they’re speaking about remote-controlled machines, much like ones already utilized by bomb squads. The distinction is these could be armed with bullets and explosives.
Shamann says the division’s causes for utilizing robots simply do not observe for him, and he provides a number of examples the place they would not be sensible.
Proponents say the robots may very well be worthwhile in mass shooter conditions — like Uvalde, TX, as an example — however Shamman says he, and lots of dad and mom, would not be snug sending in a robotic when children may very well be harm or killed.
Bottom line for the supervisor is … save the robots and drones for navy battlefields, not crowded cities crammed with harmless bystanders.
Discussion about this post