Mandatory neck guards are coming to youth hockey within the (*78*) States.
Already required in Canada and lots of different nations, USA Hockey, which governs the game on the novice degree within the U.S., has lengthy held its line at “recommending” laceration safety — particularly neck guards, but in addition cut-resistant socks, sleeves and undergarments.
The resolution was introduced Sunday and can go into impact on Aug. 1, about 9 months after the problem was thrust into the highlight when former NHL player Adam Johnson died of a skate reduce to the neck throughout a sport in England.
More NHLers have begun to put on neck safety within the months since, both often or to attempt to discover one thing comfy.
“You’re seeing more and more of it,” one player instructed The Athletic. “I wear the shirt for my wrists. I think you’re going to see more and more neck guards.”
As a part of our NHL 2023-24 player ballot, we requested these gamers what their urge for food may be for the same mandate, for neck guards and different cut-resistant tools, on the professional degree.
As you’ll be able to see, for almost all — 78.45 percent of the 181 who have been keen to reply to that query — it’s a no-go:
For most of the gamers, it comes down to non-public selection.
“I think it should just be your own decision,” one mentioned.
“Guys would be smart to use them, but I don’t think it needs to be mandatory,” one other added.
“It’s their own risk, right?” mentioned a 3rd. “It’s their life.”
Some of the gamers voting no indicated that, for his or her half, they do put on neck guards and different cut-protective gear, together with one who had been reduce by a skate prior to now.
“I wear it. It happened to me,” he mentioned. “I think it’s up to you. I think that there (should) be no requirement.”
“I don’t think you should require them to, but I think it’s stupid not to (wear one),” one other player mentioned. “Why wouldn’t you?”
“We’re all big boys,” mentioned a 3rd. “I personally wear them. But being required to? No.”
One concept many gamers shared was to mandate laceration safety at minor and youth ranges first, with the thought of ultimately bringing it to the NHL as gamers get extra used to carrying the tools.
“In the NHL, I don’t think it should be required,” one player mentioned. “But in minor hockey, I think it should.”
“If the NHL mandated it, I’d be OK with that,” mentioned one other. “But they should grandfather in everyone who’s used to not playing with it, like they did with visors.”
Some gamers indicated they’re not glad, at this level, with the engineering of skate-cut safety.
“I think we all know there’s an inherent risk, (but) I don’t think the skate-cut technology is where it needs to be for people to wear it comfortably,” one player mentioned. “I don’t love the feeling of having stuff on my wrists. I tried the neck guard. I felt like it was so high and so tight. It would take a while to get used to.”
“You want guys comfortable with what they’re wearing.”
NHL groups have labored with producers to offer choices, and quite a lot of gamers mentioned that’s the suitable response.
“I think what they’re doing right now is perfect, providing more stuff,” one mentioned.
“Should be provided, but not mandatory,” one other mentioned.
“I’m happy with it,” one other mentioned. “There’s lots of good choices. I wear the socks. After what happened to Adam Johnson, we’re all looking to maybe wear something more. That’s an eye-opener for everyone.”
With the favored sentiment amongst NHLers as it’s, some merely mentioned they don’t see a practical path ahead.
“I’d love to say yes, because I would love to never see anyone get cut ever again,” one player mentioned. “But I think that’s easier said than done.”
“It would be hard to implement,” one other mentioned. “Maybe in the future.”
One player posed a state of affairs through which the league would mandate cut-resistant tools for the neck, wrists and ankles for a trial interval earlier than deciding.
“Maybe if it was required for a short period of time, so everyone has to try them at least a little bit, I think a lot of guys would stick with it,” he mentioned. “Everyone should have their own choice, but I wouldn’t be against it if they said yes.”
“I think everybody should try it,” agreed one other.
Among the gamers answering sure, the thought of getting gamers used to it earlier than making a call was well-liked.
“Once everybody got used to it, I feel like no one would care to use it or not,” one player mentioned. “Everybody would be used to it already. Obviously, when you grow up, you use it. At one point, it’s like you don’t even notice that’s there. If it was always a thing, I think guys wouldn’t care at all to use.”
“We grew up playing with it,” one other mentioned. “It never bothered me or probably anyone else, either. If they brought it back, I think it’s a thing to get used to, and it might take some time, but if you do it in the summer, no one would be bothered by it once the season starts.”
“We did it in Sweden,” mentioned a 3rd. “It’s easy to do it here.”
And most saying sure have been in favor of phasing it in over time. New gamers coming into the league would be mandated, and ultimately that’d be everybody.
“Maybe start at the youth hockey level and make it mandatory there,” one player mentioned. “Kind of incorporate it over the years, sort of. I think (young) Canadian players might have to. In America, we didn’t have to.”
“I think you’ve got to grandfather it in just like they did with visors,” one other mentioned.
“I think that would be a good idea,” mentioned a 3rd.
(Top photograph of T.J. Oshie carrying a neck guard: Patrick Smith / Getty Images)
Discussion about this post