Pardison Fontaine has issued an announcement in assist of girls who’ve been victimized, because the trial surrounding Megan Thee Stallion‘s 2020 capturing has come to an in depth.
The songwriter posted the message through his Instagram Story on Thursday afternoon (December 22), simply hours after attorneys on each side delivered their closing arguments within the extremely publicized court docket case. While he didn’t reference Megan instantly, Pardi’s phrases appeared influenced by the occasions of the previous couple of days, throughout which his companion’s account of the capturing incident got here beneath additional scrutiny.
“To any woman especially ones of color that has suffered an injustice I feel for you,” Pardison Fontaine wrote. “When you do discover the braveness to talk up .. it appears you can be ridiculed .. your credibility will probably be questions.. your complete previous will probably be held beneath a magnifying glass .. instantly you possibly can go from sufferer to defendant within the eyes of the general public ..
He continued: “To any one with a daughter Sister mother niece or aunt .. I pray for their protection .. I pray for their covering .. I wouldn’t wish this on anyone.”
Pardison Fontaine speaks out as Megan Thee Stallion capturing trial involves an in depthhttps://t.co/52WCdDJySr pic.twitter.com/YURfoY3kHY
— HipHopDX (@HipHopDX) December 23, 2022
News surrounding the almost two-week lengthy trial was dominated by the bombshell testimony by Kelsey Harris who had been anticipated to corroborate Meg’s account of the moments that led as much as her capturing. Instead, Harris delivered an announcement that contradicted her former buddy and employer’s testimony virtually totally.
Whereas Megan Thee Stallion advised the court docket that Tory Lanez had supplied her $1 million in trade for her silence about what occurred on the night time of July 12, 2020, Kelsey Harris advised each the prosecution and the protection that she had not been supplied any such cost.
Harris additionally contradicted an announcement she had given to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s workplace in September, the place she had confirmed a few of the particulars which Megan Thee Stallion has held quick to since figuring out Tory Lanez as her alleged shooter.
Kelsey Harris’ testimony was one among a number of factors of rivalry over which the prosecution and Tory Lanez’s lawyer had been at odds because the begin of the trial on December 12. And as each side made their closing arguments to the jury on Thursday, every highlighted moments from the trial which they felt had gone their approach.
Prosecutors rebutted, saying many convictions occur w/o DNA, and reminded jurors of the firsthand accounts from witnesses, resembling Sean Kelly, a neighbor who had seen the capturing. Kelly had testified he noticed muzzle flashes coming from a brief man and heard the sound of pictures.
— jonah valdez (@jonahmv) December 22, 2022
According to Los Angeles Times reporter Jonah Valdez, who shared notes from the trial through Twitter, prosecutors introduced the jury’s consideration again to earlier testimony by three firearms consultants relating to the absence of DNA proof on the gun. Prosecutors, then again, redirected the jury to think about the firsthand account offered by plenty of witnesses.
“Defense attorneys reminded jurors of the lack of DNA evidence in the case, which was inconclusive and that Tory’s DNA didn’t show up on the gun or magazine,” Valdez tweeted. “They continued to place the gun, and blame, on Kelsey Harris, Meg’s ex-bff.”
Tory Lanez Handed Third Felony Charge In Megan Thee Stallion Shooting Case
“Prosecutors rebutted, saying many convictions happen w/o DNA,” he wrote in a separate tweet, “and reminded jurors of the firsthand accounts from witnesses, such as Sean Kelly, a neighbor who had seen the shooting. Kelly had testified he saw muzzle flashes coming from a short man and heard the sound of shots.”
In a statement on Thursday afternoon, the Los Angeles Superior Court workplace of public info introduced that a couple of minutes earlier than the top of their session, the jurors requested that Judge David Herriford present “a better definition of the word ‘willfully’ and ‘on purpose’” for the sake of their deliberation.
The jury had been given the choice of constant their deliberation after the Christmas vacation in the event that they had been unable to succeed in a choice on Thursday. However, they’ve determined to renew on Friday morning (December 23).
Discussion about this post