Tennis is doing what it does each 10-15 years or so — having a reckoning with its countless schedule, its nonsensical governing construction, and a aggressive format that even religious followers wrestle to perceive.
The sport is performed internationally, with nations on each continent besides Antarctica producing high gamers. No main sport integrates women and men extra efficiently, or has come as shut to pay equality, although there is work to be finished on these fronts. Nearly each day of the 12 months, an attractive skilled match unfolds someplace on the planet.
And but, the almost unanimous opinion of everybody concerned within the sport — its leaders, its gamers, event organizers, sponsors, media executives, coaches — is that skilled tennis is damaged, a structural mess that exhausts its gamers, cannibalizes its enterprise with dueling occasions and exists in a relentless state of civil conflict amongst its alphabet soup of governing our bodies. There are seven of them, or perhaps 9 or 10, relying on who is doing the counting.
“Such an amazing sport and so screwed up,” stated Pam Shriver, the previous star participant who is now a commentator and a coach.
“I can’t even get quoted about it anymore without using bad language,” stated one other former participant who has been concerned in tennis for many years. She was proper. She couldn’t.
Phil de Picciotto, the chief government and founding father of Octagon, the sports activities advertising agency with deep roots in skilled tennis, has been in convention rooms crammed with leaders of the game making an attempt to fix it on and off for greater than 30 years. What usually occurs, he stated, is that everybody gravitates towards one in every of two reverse poles.
At one finish are those that favor creating probably the most gamers, which requires giving as many individuals as doable a chance to progress with tournaments on a regular basis everywhere in the world. At the opposite finish is the Grand Slams – singular occasions that concentrate on the elite of the elite and appeal to probably the most informal of sports activities followers.
“Both are really important,” de Picciotto stated. “People can adopt both of those bookends and they do. The battleground becomes everything in between.”
As the 2024 tennis season will get underway in Australia, what would possibly make this reckoning totally different from all of the earlier reckonings is the close to unanimity on what tennis wants to fix itself. Ask almost anybody concerned in almost any side of the game how to fix it, which we did, and the identical reply virtually all the time comes again: a clearly outlined, premium tennis tour constructed across the sport’s most beneficial legacy occasions and its greatest gamers that is simple to comply with, contains each women and men and doesn’t overtax stars.
Even those that have to be in opposition to that generally prescribed resolution as a result of there is an opportunity it would possibly hurt their investments — specifically the house owners of small and mid-sized tournaments — primarily agree this is what tennis wants. They are sports activities executives they usually perceive that almost each different profitable sport makes use of some model of that very same components.
No one is aware of precisely how to handle all the small print. What jobs and occasions to eradicate. How to unwind all of the conflicting contracts. The algorithm to divvy up the loot from a mixed premium tour in order that the lesser competitions which might be important for the game’s improvement don’t grow to be extinct stays a piece in progress — and possibly all the time might be.
Tennis has tried to create variations of this earlier than, solely to have the plans collapse due to battles over territory, energy and cash. This time, veterans of the game say, it feels totally different, a results of each need and necessity, as leaders face a mix of inner and exterior stress to change or be modified.
Fixing every thing in tennis in a single fell swoop could also be past anybody’s attain, however sensible, skilled folks like John Morris, who represents a number of high gamers for his firm, 72 Sports Group, and is a longtime tennis government, say establishing a premier tour would symbolize a major begin.
“If this can happen,” Morris stated, “a lot of the things that need to be corrected can be corrected.”
How we received right here
The tennis world comes collectively annually at Wimbledon, the oldest and most prestigious event within the sport.
As the tennis unfolds on the grass courts, the game’s movers and shakers, together with leaders of the excursions, the 4 Grand Slams, the International Tennis Federation, and scores of media executives, brokers and company leaders, lower offers over glasses of Champagne and catered lunches, cocktail hours and dinners inside the company suites on the All England Lawn Tennis Club and the stately houses on the hilly streets close by.
This is the place, in early July, phrase started to flow into that Andrea Gaudenzi, the previous participant who is the chairman of the boys’s circuit, the ATP Tour, was on the verge of an enormous one. Gaudenzi was closing in on a take care of Saudi Arabia to ship a high event to the dominion as quickly as January 2025.
Saudi Arabia had upended golf the earlier 12 months by launching a rival tour. Gaudenzi needed to do every thing in his energy to forestall that from occurring in tennis.
Inviting the Saudis into the clubby higher echelon of the sport by permitting them to launch a serious new occasion appeared like the very best technique. A high Saudi occasion initially of the 12 months would possible doom the sequence of small and mid-sized tournaments in Australia and New Zealand throughout these weeks, however they weren’t Gaudenzi’s precedence. Placating the Saudis was.
Then phrase of the deal made its approach to Craig Tiley, the chief of Tennis Australia. Tiley and Tennis Australia’s different leaders had been staying in a good-looking brick dwelling on a quiet block between the All England Club and Wimbledon Village. From his perch a number of streets from the event, Tiley, a South African who performed professionally earlier than turning into a high faculty coach within the U.S. and evolving into a number one tennis government, swung into motion.
If Gaudenzi was going to deal with key occasions of Tennis Australia’s annual “summer of tennis” as collateral injury, Tiley, who declined to be interviewed for this story, was going proper again at him.
Long acknowledged as among the many most modern minds in tennis, Tiley started working the telephones and the facility facilities at Wimbledon to get the leaders of the opposite three Grand Slams to assist his effort to cleave the highest tournaments from males’s and ladies’s excursions, often called the “Masters” and “1,000s” to launch the premium tennis circuit that so many within the sport craved.
Through the summer time and fall, Tiley’s push for a tennis tour that resembled Formula One continued to acquire momentum, particularly inside the Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA), the nascent gamers group that Novak Djokovic co-founded three years in the past. A proper proposal is anticipated within the coming weeks.
Why now is totally different
“We are closer than we ever have been,” stated one longtime business government concerned with the discussions, each this 12 months and prior to now. Like a number of others, he requested anonymity as a result of he was not licensed to reveal particulars of inner discussions.
He then defined why he was optimistic that change was on the best way.
“You have external forces in the form of Saudi Arabia and the PTPA that you didn’t have before.”
Let’s unpack that.
LIV Golf modified every thing.
When Saudi Arabia launched its quest final 12 months to upend skilled golf by paying high gamers tons of of thousands and thousands of {dollars} to compete on a brand new rival tour, leaders of the organizations which have managed skilled tennis for the final half-century knew their supremacy might quickly be underneath menace.
Tennis gamers obtain roughly 1 / 4 of the game’s revenues, in contrast with about 50 per cent in main staff sports activities. It wouldn’t take a lot for a deep-pocketed investor to supply the very best ones a higher-paying, much less demanding different.
Also, through the previous three years, the PTPA has grown into one thing the game has by no means had — a viable and well-financed unbiased platform for gamers to assault the established order.
The males’s and ladies’s excursions, the WTA and the ATP, have largely handled the PTPA as an out of doors agitator. In October, Steve Simon, the chief government of the WTA Tour, refused to permit a PTPA consultant to participate in a gathering between him and the highest 20 gamers, greater than half of whom are members of the PTPA.
The Grand Slams took one other tack, utilizing the PTPA to work with gamers to attempt to meet their office wants. That has helped set up a respectful management-labor dynamic and a degree of belief within the Grand Slams as they work to change the aggressive construction of the game.
“A players association is here now and they understand that as something that needs to be accepted,” Vasek Pospisil, a veteran participant from Canada and a founding member of the PTPA, stated of the Grand Slams. “They want the players to have a seat at the table.”
It additionally helps that the Grand Slams share more cash with the gamers than the common tour occasions.
Finally, the Grand Slams discovered in 2022 that they don’t want the excursions. The excursions withheld rankings factors from Wimbledon final 12 months when the All England Club and the Lawn Tennis Association, which oversees tennis in Great Britain, refused to permit gamers from Belarus and Russia to take part as a punishment for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
The remainder of the gamers got here anyway. Stadiums had been packed. Television rankings remained sky-high. No one actually cared whether or not gamers obtained rating factors.
What would tennis appear like underneath the brand new framework?
The particulars are nonetheless being labored out, however the broad define is constructed round a premier tour for top-level gamers — say, roughly the highest 100.
They would play not less than the 14 largest tournaments on the schedule: the Grand Slams, the 10-12 largest and most profitable tour occasions, and the 2 tour finals. They might drop down and play a number of smaller tournaments, however something that occurs in these tournaments is separate from the principle tour.
The premier occasions would come with Wimbledon, the U.S., Australian and French Opens; combined occasions in Indian Wells, Miami, Madrid, Rome, Toronto/Montreal, and Cincinnati; males’s tournaments in Monte Carlo, Paris and Shanghai; Women’s occasions in Dubai, Doha and Beijing. Other high candidates for inclusion would come with occasions in Washington D.C., Tokyo, and probably the boys’s occasion in Beijing, since they’re world capitals.
All the opposite occasions can be a part of a developmental tour, with gamers exterior the highest 100 competing to make the premier tour. Higher-ranked gamers who want matches or need to accumulate an look charge might play in a number of of these occasions annually, however the outcomes wouldn’t depend towards the premier tour standings and rankings.
The tour can be managed by a board with representatives of the Grand Slams, the opposite huge tournaments, and representatives of the ATP and the WTA. The gamers would sit on the labor facet of the negotiating desk and collectively discount for his or her share of the revenues as they do in different profitable sports activities.
It’s unclear how the International Tennis Federation, which controls worldwide staff competitions just like the Davis Cup, the Billie Jean King Cup and the Olympic tournaments, would match into this construction, if in any respect. That stated, the ITF is reexamining the format of its competitions proper now and desires to get its personal home so as first.
Why does a premier tour have a lot assist?
Everyone in tennis believes the season is too lengthy and disparate. It is.
It lasts 11 months and is unimaginable to handle, with the seven totally different governing our bodies always combating with each other concerning the schedule. It is additionally too sophisticated for lay followers to preserve observe of.
“It’s like having a calendar with seven different discussions in seven different rooms,” Gaudenzi stated in November throughout a gathering with a small group of journalists in Italy. “I’m trying to convince everybody we’re managing one product. We’re all part of the same book. We might write different chapters, but we’re part of the same book and we can’t sell different chapters in different bookstores.”
Selling only one “book”, to use Gaudenzi’s metaphor, would make the game easier to comply with and sure drive up the worth for media rights and sponsorships. Right now, tournaments and the totally different governing our bodies compete with each other. That drives down costs since consumers can play one off in opposition to the opposite. Bundling a set of premier tournaments, promoting them collectively and partnering with networks devoted to exploiting all of the content material the game produces as a substitute of simply the ultimate rounds would possible drive up funding considerably.
That can be a boon to organizers of the highest tournaments and to gamers. They need to play much less, earn more cash and eradicate any incentive to play each week.
“Right now the system is structured so that if I don’t play every week I can’t get to the ranking I need,” Pospisil stated. “To go up the rankings, you’ve got to play non-stop.”
Raemon Sluiter, a veteran coach, stated the beginning of Elina Svitolina’s first youngster final 12 months gave the star from Ukraine a bonus — earlier than she returned, she lastly had the chance to apply for greater than two months straight, far longer than the standard gruelling schedule permits. Top tennis gamers usually take pleasure in an low season that lasts about two weeks, which isn’t sufficient time to make any important modifications. A slimmed-down tour might make an enormous distinction.
The winners
“It is very good to be a 1,000 event right now,” stated a high government at an organization that owns one.
Indeed, the largest tournaments in tennis exterior the Grand Slams are the belles of the ball in the mean time. Tiley and the Grand Slams need them for his or her premier tour. The ATP and the WTA need to keep their associations with these historic tour stops, akin to Indian Wells, Miami, Madrid and Rome, in order that they aren’t relegated to working the tennis minor leagues.
Also, think about a tennis investor like Ben Navarro, who not too long ago bought the Cincinnati Masters for roughly $300million. If Cincinnati lands a spot on the premier tour, his occasion is now part of the identical circuit and enterprise operation as Wimbledon quite than, say, Delray Beach. Not dangerous.
The identical goes for CVC Capital Partners, the personal fairness agency that purchased a 20 per cent stake within the WTA Tour in 2023 for $150million. If the WTA can negotiate an possession stake and a seat on the board within the premier tour, CVC is now in enterprise with the largest occasions within the sport.
The losers — however maybe not a lot
The small and medium-sized tournaments, competitions in locations like Dallas, Basel, and Buenos Aires, are going to have a tough time swallowing the prospect of relegation to the minor leagues. They have spent thousands and thousands of {dollars} on license agreements to be part of the ATP and the WTA. Also, there is a query of whether or not narrowing the scope of big-time tennis to a premier tour is good for the long-term well being of the skilled sport.
“The big difference between tennis and nearly every other sport is that tennis events are tied to participation,” stated the proprietor of a mid-sized event. “F1 is a spectacle. You can’t grow a global participation sport with 14 tournaments around the world.”
That line of pondering, nevertheless, depends on the premise that curiosity will routinely diminish within the small and mid-sized tournaments with the arrival of a premier tour, quite than understanding the enchantment of a cohesive system constructed round promotion and relegation.
“There isn’t really a tour right now,” stated John Morris, the business veteran on the helm of 72 Sports. “It’s a circus made up of individual promoters and I say that with all due respect.”
Morris stated the small- and mid-sized tournaments is likely to be extra interesting than they’re now if the game organized them into regional circuits, with gamers competing to make the premier tour for the next season and coveted spots all through the season within the Grand Slams and different high occasions.
In different phrases, whoever wins in Estoril, Portugal, Charleston, S.C. or Auckland might have new import, as well as to the restricted star sights they now take pleasure in. Play effectively for six weeks on lower-tier excursions and obtain a wild card entry into, say, the French Open.
Most importantly, Morris stated, gamers exterior the highest 100 wouldn’t go broke funding their journey around the globe since they’d largely play inside their areas on a circuit with much more cohesion and maybe even a minimal wage. Prize cash wouldn’t essentially have to rise all that a lot as a result of the prices for gamers would fall.
“Finding a one-size-fits-all solution that fixes everything all at once is difficult,” Pospisil stated. “As for lower-tier tournaments, I don’t think it would be worse. Maybe this results in a much bigger place for them.”
(Top photograph: Getty Images; design: Sean Reilly)
Discussion about this post