Was Raquel Leviss‘ authorized drama with Scheana Shay only a PR stunt?
By now you understand the 28-year-old actuality star beforehand obtained a short lived restraining order towards her co-star, claiming the mother of 1 punched her when she discovered about her affair with Tom Sandoval. The 37-year-old denied attacking Raquel, claiming the “supposed dark markings around [Leviss’] left eye have been there for months.” She even went as far as to accuse her of “sabotaging” the Season 10 reunion because the two weren’t allowed to work together or be inside 100 yards of one another on the time. And sure, Raquel did find yourself dropping it the day after the reunion was filmed — despite the fact that their courtroom listening to wasn’t scheduled till a number of days in a while March 29. Or did she??
Related: Ariana Refuses To Film With Sandoval — What Does This Mean For VPR?!
You could recall, Raquel doubled down on Wednesday that the bodily altercation occurred, leading to a “permanent scar” on her left eyebrow. Either means, this authorized matter clearly made issues sophisticated when it got here to the reunion, forcing manufacturing to get artistic and make the castmates change locations all through filming on Thursday.
But in a stunning twist, Raquel introduced her resolution to drop her request for a everlasting restraining order on Friday — and claimed it was all Scheana’s fault they weren’t capable of movie the reunion collectively:
“My team tried to work with Scheana on a mutually beneficial agreement hoping to get the TRO dropped earlier so we could film [the reunion episode] together. The TRO was intended to provide a cooling-off period after I was punched but I didn’t want to continue with the permanent RO nor did I want to cause Scheana further agony and stress.”
Seriously???
The day after the reunion, now you don’t have a everlasting scar anymore?? The timing of this newest replace of their authorized drama is slightly sus, when you ask us. And we’re not the one ones who assume so. A supply instructed Page Six on Friday that Raquel supposedly dropping her requisition for a everlasting restraining order is “just another PR stunt,” including:
“There is no mechanism to terminate a civil temporary restraining order (TRO) early, unlike a domestic violence temporary restraining order.”
So her announcement doesn’t imply something? Wild!
The insider additional accused Raquel of making an attempt to keep away from getting “in front of a judge,” saying:
“Raquel made false claims in order to obtain the TRO against Scheana and is aware that having to account for those in front of a judge are not in her best interest.”
Considering the previous pageant queen (as a substitute of sending it to Darrell) had Andy Cohen serve Scheana with faux authorized docs in the course of the reunion, it wouldn’t be stunning if this newest transfer was a PR stunt.
And innerestingly sufficient, Raquel claimed her lawyer eliminated the castmates’ listening to from the courtroom calendar and was submitting the suitable paperwork requested by the courtroom immediately to dismiss the entire thing. However, Page Six famous that the SUR waitress by no means wanted Scheana’s permission to finish the restraining order petition — so she might have ended it even when they couldn’t come to an settlement and he or she really wished to finish her “agony and stress” over the scenario earlier than the reunion. That’s not a superb search for Raquel.
It can be unknown when the PRO case will probably be dropped because the outlet reported that the Los Angeles Superior Court calendar nonetheless has their listening to scheduled for March 29. Hmm. And as Scheana’s legal professional beforehand said:
“There is no way for Rachel to ‘drop’ the temporary restraining order before next week’s hearing. This is California law and even on the court’s website.”
Will she simply be capable to finish the entire thing? Could she get in bother, assuming the sources are proper? Reactions, Perezcious readers? Let us know within the feedback under.
[Image via MEGA/WENN]
Discussion about this post