Raquel Restraining Order Hearing Still Happening

Ready for her day in courtroom. Scheana Shay’s legal professional, Neama Rahmani, denied that Raquel Leviss dropped her non permanent restraining order forward of their upcoming listening to.

“We plan to show up in court tomorrow to prove these allegations are false and that Rachel lied about the entire thing,” Rahmani informed Us Weekly in a press release on Tuesday, March 28. “Despite reports that Rachel has dropped the temporary restraining order, the case remains on the court calendar for Wednesday, and we will be there to vigorously defend Scheana.”

Shay’s legal professional claimed that Leviss’ illustration didn’t undergo the right channels to halt the proceedings.

“If they want to move forward with this tomorrow, we’re going to need to request a continuance in order to get our witnesses lined up, but we feel very confident that we will prevail in this case,” Rahmani continued. “The court has confirmed that the case is still on the calendar. These types of hearings cannot be dismissed so we must show up in order to resolve the matter or to seek the continuance to fight these scurrilous accusations and win.”

Leviss, 28, for her half, introduced her plans to drop the restarting order on Friday, March 24. “I can confirm that my attorney took my case off the court calendar Wednesday and is filing the appropriate paperwork requested by the court today to dismiss the TRO from moving forward after the 29th,” the previous magnificence pageant contestant mentioned in a press release. “We let the court know I will not be moving forward with a permanent restraining order.”

The California native initially filed an order of safety on March 7 after rumors swirled of a bodily altercation between her and Shay, 36, after their joint look on Watch What Happens Live With Andy Cohen that very same month. The hypothesis got here as information broke about Leviss’ affair with Tom Sandoval.

After photographs of Leviss’ alleged accidents surfaced on-line, Rahmani denied that the “Good as Gold” singer harmed her costar.

“This case is a fabrication by a known liar and a cheat who has betrayed everyone close to her. Scheana never punched Raquel, period,” the legal professional informed Us on the time. “The supposed dark markings around her left eye have been there for months.. … Scheana is obviously upset. [She] and Raquel were friends for years. She actually invited Raquel into her home where she lived for six months. So, for her to betray her like this, she’s devastated.”

Leviss and Scheana finally weren’t capable of cross paths on Thursday, March 23, whereas the Vanderpump Rules forged filmed the season 10 reunion collectively. Us confirmed that the coworkers swapped locations through the taping since Shay was ordered to remain 100 yards away from Leviss till their listening to.

Shortly after cameras stopped rolling, Leviss claimed that she made makes an attempt to work out her points with Shay earlier than the reunion.

“My team tried to work with Scheana on a mutually beneficial agreement hoping to get the TRO dropped earlier so we could film together,” she acknowledged in Friday’s assertion. “The TRO was intended to provide a cooling-off period after I was punched but I didn’t want to continue with the permanent RO nor did I want to cause Scheana further agony and stress. The document was a dismissal form that the court asked us to submit and I wanted to show Scheana my intentions and that we had informed the judge we weren’t moving forward – and it was an explanation at the reunion to alleviate Scheana’s concerns.”

Meanwhile, Rahmani, referred to as Leviss’ determination to offer Andy Cohen authorized paperwork on display handy over to Shay a “stunt.”

Sign up for Us Weekly’s free, every day publication and by no means miss breaking information or unique tales about your favourite celebrities, TV reveals and extra!

“Rachel had Andy ‘serve’ Scheana with a document during the reunion, but the papers have no legal meaning. It was a request to dismiss a complaint or a civil lawsuit, but Rachel had requested a permanent restraining order, which is something completely different,” he added that very same day. “There is no way for Rachel to ‘drop’ the temporary restraining order before next week’s hearing. This is California law and even on the court’s website. Even if Rachel had the correct document, which she didn’t, it wasn’t filed with the court. There is no file stamp in the top right corner.”