Well, welcome again to the discourse, Olivia Wilde. Clearly that is the place she’s meant to be, proper?
The Don’t Worry Darling director waded into the nationwide dialog about Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce‘s burgeoning romance on Thursday by sharing a tweet to her personal Instagram Stories that reads:
“I wish Taylor Swift was in love with a climate scientist.”
Huh. She’s clearly referring to the bump in scores and common curiosity Taylor is giving to the NFL of all issues. Suddenly Tay’s followers are watching video games — one thing we are able to inform for positive by the record-breaking scores.
Olivia was not the unique creator of the tweet, that might be a self-described “climate activist” going by the title Katja Herbers. (We not have any means of telling if she is who she says she is, after all, with Twitter being the hellscape it’s. Sorry, with X being the hellscape it’s.) But Katja made her intentions somewhat clearer with a followup tweet, writing:
“Taylor would join her scientist at an end fossil fuels rally and the world would be saved”
It is loads of energy Taylor wields, that’s for positive. She posted a hyperlink to a voter registration web site — and the outcome was a spike of 35,000 new voters registered in a single day! Katja’s concept, cosigned by Olivia, is how nice it might be for Taylor to offer that form of bump to the local weather science neighborhood. We get it. It’s cute and all. Certainly coming from a local weather activist.
But what about coming from… a fellow feminine celeb? That’s the place it will get somewhat problematic for followers…
Related: Travis Kelce BRILLIANTLY Responds To Aaron Rodgers’ ‘Mr. Pfizer’ Insult!
See, we’re positive Olivia hated everybody scrutinizing her relationship drama when that was the most important story in celeb information. So she’s in form of an odd place to be commenting. Especially when the remark will be seen as shady from her… particularly particularly when it comes from an ex’s ex!
First, it dehumanizes Taylor. Like she’s only a commodity, a model, not an precise human being who actually is being wooed by a hunky man she simply met. Like, does she assume Taylor owes it to everybody up to now the fitting particular person? Instead of a soccer participant? Pretty demeaning coming from a fellow star who ought to know what it’s prefer to be handled that means. We imply, how did she really feel when of us had been speculating she was relationship Harry Styles to remain related? It wasn’t a good factor to recommend, however it obtained stated. How completely different is it actually?
And oh yeah, in case you forgot, each these girls dated Harry Styles! Speaking of which… Olivia is in the very same relationship pool as Taylor! Literally one diploma of separation from her, in reality! We imply… in contrast to Katja Q. Public, Olivia may additionally select to date a local weather scientist and increase curiosity within the area. Why doesn’t she go try this? Oh, possibly as a result of relationships don’t work that means? Love doesn’t work that means? And for those who assume it does for Taylor, you would possibly kiiiiiiinda be implying she’s simply making her relationship choices for PR? Just possibly?
Again, we didn’t learn this a lot into it when it was coming from some local weather activist — however it hits completely different coming from a film star who dated a man a couple of years after Taylor did. Right??
Don’t take our phrase for it — try a few of the strongest reactions from followers:
“Olivia Wilde posting this when she hasnt done a thing for climate change, is a performative activist..attaches her name to any big name celeb.. what a freaking fake af hypocrite.. keep Taylor swifts name out of your mouth loser., and I wish OW would get her own life.”
“I get it but like also…who is olivia wilde to say s**t. I dont remember harry styles restoring the ozone when they were dating.”
“olivia wilde is rlly THAT jobless she’s s**t talking and making misogynistic comments about taylor on her insta story???? so much for being a ‘feminist’”
“olivia wilde is so lame talking about taylor should date a climate scientist as if she wasn’t flying in harry’s private jet to every single show”
“Taylor Swift catching wind of that Olivia Wilde shade about to call up her James Dean Daydream for a little 1989 TV promo. She’ll be addressing climate change via eco friendly Lime Bike sesh with their mutual ex in 3… 2…”
But hey, possibly Olivia didn’t imply any of that by it. Maybe she didn’t assume too exhausting about it in any respect, simply needed to leap on the bandwagon of claiming YEAH CLIMATE SCIENCE GOOD, FOOTBALL BAD! Maybe she was advantage signaling. Maybe she simply thought it was humorous.
What do YOU assume, Perezcious readers? Shade? Or no shade??
[Image via MEGA/WENN.]
Discussion about this post