Taylor Swift Associates Pissed About Article Speculating on Her Sexuality

Taylor Swift grew to become the topic of a complete article attempting to determine if she was a part of the LGBTQ+ neighborhood … and apparently, individuals in her world are fairly pissed about it.

The NYT just lately revealed an op-ed by author Anna Marks — who identifies as queer — and it is titled, “Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do.” The total premise of the piece is a deep dive into hypothesis that TS would possibly, maybe, be one thing aside from straight.

Marks refers to moments she perceives as Taylor “dropping hairpins” (aka, dropping clues about being LGBTQ+) all through her profession … writing, “In isolation, a single dropped hairpin is perhaps meaningless or accidental, but considered together, they’re the unfurling of a ballerina bun after a long performance.”

She provides, “Those dropped hairpins began to appear in Ms. Swift’s artistry long before queer identity was undeniably marketable to mainstream America. They suggest to queer people that she is one of us.” If it feels like a attain, Taylor’s camp appears to really feel the identical method.

While Taylor has actually confirmed herself to be ally to the LGBTQ+ neighborhood, she’s by no means explicitly indicated she’s into something however dudes — in reality, her courting report proves that.

That level was hit dwelling by somebody near Taylor, who instructed CNN … “Because of her massive success, in this moment there is a Taylor-shaped hole in people’s ethics. This article wouldn’t have been allowed to be written about Shawn Mendes or any male artist whose sexuality has been questioned by fans.”

This individual provides, “There seems to be no boundary some journalists won’t cross when writing about Taylor, regardless of how invasive, untrue, and inappropriate it is — all under the protective veil of an ‘opinion piece.'”

There have, in reality, been assume items written about male pop stars and their sexuality … specifically, Harry Styles, Bad Bunny, and so forth. But this level is effectively taken — simply go away or not it’s, individuals.