Peter Storrie can bear in mind visiting the London studio of Herzog & de Meuron, the famend Swiss architects, and being proven a placing imaginative and prescient of Portsmouth’s future.
“It was something else,” he tells The Athletic. “They put it up on the screen for us and it certainly had the wow factor.”
This was 2007 and the formidable plans were for a brand new 36,000-capacity stadium on town’s docks. Storrie, then chief government, had accepted that Portsmouth would wish to depart Fratton Park, the membership’s residence since 1899, and a proposed relocation might hardly have been extra spectacular.
Located in between the Spinnaker Tower and the historic naval base, a £600million waterfront challenge that would come with flats and eating places promised a transformational impression.
“This will be the most spectacular stadium, set against the backdrop of the harbour and the English Channel befitting the club’s history,“ said Storrie back in 2007, when Portsmouth were a top-half Premier League club.
They would win the FA Cup a year later when beating Cardiff City, too, but by that time plans for a new stadium had been all but scrapped. Opposition had come from local councillors and the British Royal Navy, who had “operational and security concerns” after selecting to base two tremendous plane carriers close by.
Portsmouth pivoted from the dockyards to a different waterfront web site close by at Horsea Island, once more designed by Herzog & de Meuron with little expense spared. Again it collapsed, this time in opposition to the backdrop of the worldwide monetary disaster of 2008. As such, Fratton Park, boisterous however restricted, stays the membership’s residence.
Portsmouth’s plans at Horsea Island (Herzog & de Meuron)
“The stadium on the docks was a fantastic design, really stunning,” Storrie says. “It would’ve been perfect. It was there on the waterfront. It would’ve been an iconic venue. One of the great stadiums if it had been built.
“Would it ever have got through planning? Probably not — but who knows? It was one of the great designs that never happened.”
And it’s a crowded area. For each spectacular stadium constructed by English golf equipment within the final 30 years, there was one other that didn’t get past the architects’ drawings or the fantasies of an proprietor.
Like Chelsea’s imaginative and prescient for Battersea Power Station and the Gothic re-imagining of Stamford Bridge. Or Liverpool’s proposed transfer to a futuristic new residence in Stanley Park. Everton lived out three totally different initiatives at Kings Dock, Kirkby and Walton Hall Park earlier than lastly planting a spade within the floor at Bramley-Moore Dock, web site of their long-awaited new residence from the 2025-26 season.
Tottenham Hotspur had their very own plans to knock down and rebuild the Olympic Stadium earlier than West Ham United turned tenants in 2016, whereas as soon as upon a time Birmingham City had plans for a 55,000-seater stadium that would type a part of the Birmingham Sports Village. Karren Brady, Birmingham’s managing director again in 2006, known as it “a once-in-a-lifetime regeneration project.” Or, because it turned out, not-in-this-lifetime.
That is typical of the well-versed huge promote, particularly when supporters are being requested to depart a historic residence. Project what the longer term would possibly appear like in all its animated glory and hope it marks step one on the journey.
Actions don’t all the time accompany the phrases. Whether by means of funding issues or supporter opposition, typically each, English football has an extended checklist of initiatives that have gone to the good drafting board within the sky.
Leeds United were using the crest of a wave again within the spring of 2001. A run to the Champions League semi-finals, the place they were crushed 3-0 by Valencia, had emboldened the assumption that Leeds might set up themselves amongst English football’s elite and a part of the grand plan was a transfer away from Elland Road.
A wasteland web site was picked close to junction 45 of the A1(M) at Skelton and a brand new £40million, 50,000-capacity floor was proposed. Elland Road, in the meantime, could be offered to the native council for an estimated £20million to assist fund it.
Peter Ridsdale, Leeds’ chairman, had a blunt message as they tried to maintain tempo with these on the prime of the Premier League. “Doing nothing is not an option,” he warned in a letter to followers.
All supporters were requested if they’d again a renovation of Elland Road or a transfer to a brand new stadium throughout a session course of. “On the one hand there is the history and the memories that we all share, and on the other hand is the need to ensure that we offer future generations a world-class team and a world-class stadium,” mentioned Ridsdale.
Three months later it was introduced that 87.6 per cent of the votes solid had been in favour of leaving Elland Road. “An overwhelming endorsement,” concluded Ridsdale, who outlined plans to search out sponsorship for the membership’s new residence.
Elland Road has been largely untouched for years (Serena Taylor/Newcastle United through Getty Images)
The push to maneuver was not as universally standard as Ridsdale had claimed after lower than half of poll papers were returned however these in opposition, the traditionalists eager to remain at Elland Road, needn’t have apprehensive.
Leeds’ outlay of £77million on gamers contained in the earlier three lavish years caught up with them and inside three years of Ridsdale championing a transfer, it was a Championship membership as soon as extra. Skelton was quietly brushed underneath the carpet and twenty years later, with no significant restoration work accomplished, Elland Road and its limitations stay a headache for others to inherit.
Funding — or an absence of it — usually turns into the insurmountable impediment in these grand stadium designs.
Constructing a brand new residence from scratch or rebuilding an present floor is the largest attainable expenditure any membership can face and, as such, is reliant on large borrowings. The largest and greatest are actually £1billion initiatives.
Liverpool didn’t have to search out that a lot again in 2007 however even the touted £400million wanted to construct a 60,000-seater stadium in Stanley Park proved past former homeowners Tom Hicks and George Gillett.
Leaving Anfield behind had been a key thread to the guarantees of the U.S. businessmen, with Gillett pledging at his opening press convention that “the shovel needs to be in the ground in the next 60 days.”
The earlier 5 years, earlier than the arrival of Hicks and Gillett, had seen a variety of plans put ahead, with define planning permission accepted for a Stanley Park stadium way back to 2003.
Original plans were redesigned by Hicks and Gillett and revised once more after a goal to start work in the summertime of 2007 was missed, earlier than any tangible hope of a brand new stadium started to recede in 2008.
Like Portsmouth, the credit score crunch and homeowners with restricted sources introduced the challenge to a standstill.
“Our commitment to building a new world-class Liverpool Football Club stadium is undiminished,” mentioned Liverpool in an announcement. “Like many other major development projects in the UK and overseas we are affected by global market conditions. We will use this period productively and revisit the plans for the stadium to increase its capacity to 73,000 seats.”
The imaginative and prescient didn’t materialise, although. Year after yr there was no significant progress till Hicks and Gillett were changed by Fenway Sports Group, who confirmed their intention to as an alternative redevelop Anfield in 2012.
“It could have been brilliant but we have probably set ourselves back several years,” former chief government Ian Ayre mentioned in 2011. Liverpool will lastly get the 60,000-capacity stadium they’ve spent 20 years ready for when the brand new Anfield Road Stand is absolutely opened by the tip of January.
Those years of uncertainty at the beginning of this century would recurrently see a contentious plan proposed. With Everton accepting the necessity to go away Goodison Park for twenty years or extra, a floor share between the 2 Merseyside golf equipment was touted on multiple event.
As a lot as £30million was promised from public funds in 2003 for a brand new super-stadium within the metropolis. The North West Development Agency proposed that Liverpool and Everton ought to share in a bid to regenerate the broader Anfield space and 6 years later, as England gathered collectively its push to host the 2018 World Cup. Meetings were even held with the then sports activities minister Richard Caborn.
Goodison and Anfield is separated by Stanley Park – plans to construct one stadium to deal with them each didn’t go down effectively (Simon Stacpoole/Offside/Offside through Getty Images)
The plans, although, were constantly met with opposition from the 2 rivals, each within the boardroom and amongst fan teams. Everton described it as “utter nonsense” the golf equipment ought to groundshare in 2009.
That was as a result of they’d different concepts. Big ones. Unperturbed by the failed try to construct a brand new 50,000-seater stadium on the King’s Dock, now web site of the Liverpool Echo Arena, by 2007 they were pushing forward with a transfer to a web site in Kirkby, eight miles out of town centre on Liverpool’s northern edge.
It would type a part of an unlimited retail park headed up by Tesco and the capability will increase were forecast to generate £6million extra per season. Selling the naming rights for the stadium would earn the identical quantity once more.
Not that it ever went to plan. An opposition group, the Keep Everton In Our City Campaign, was fashioned, whereas Liverpool City Council, who felt Everton mustn’t go away their boundaries, were strongly in opposition to the transfer. Leader Warren Bradley known as the proposed stadium in Kirkby “a cow shed in a small town”. They bought their want by 2009, a interval of financial stress that harm the development business, when the UK authorities blocked the proposed £400million joint improvement.
Good issues are coming to those that have waited, although. After all of the false dawns and stadium designs that never were throughout 20 years, Everton will relocate to Bramley Moore-Dock in 18 months, an exquisite new stadium that can be one in all 10 hosts for Euro 2028.
If Everton will quickly be part of Liverpool in having the larger residence they all the time wished, others usually are not so lucky. Chelsea supporters proceed to attend on proposals that would see Stamford Bridge redeveloped or an extended affiliation with their residence floor ended by a transfer. The capability of 40,000 ceased to be ample way back.
History tells us that. Chelsea’s earlier proprietor, Roman Abramovich, was keen to extend matchday revenues way back to 2012 when the membership submitted a proper supply to purchase Battersea Power Station on the south financial institution of the Thames. The web site alone was valued at £500million and given the Grade II listed standing of the previous electrical energy station, plans were unveiled that would see its 4 iconic chimneys integrated right into a design.
Chelsea wished to redevelop Battersea Power Station (Vittorio Zunino Celotto/Getty Images)
Designs were made public after Chelsea had been outbid by Malaysian property builders SP Setia and Sime Darby Property, regarded on the time as a way of making use of diplomatic stress.
“We firmly believe our proposals could address the unique challenges presented by the site,” mentioned Chelsea in an announcement. “The design would integrate the stadium with the power station in a sensitive, unique and powerful way, with all significant historical aspects of the Power Station to be retained.”
Not that it made a lot distinction. The spectacular restored web site is now residence to flats, outlets, bars and eating places.
Chelsea didn’t stand nonetheless and, three years after their failed try to purchase Battersea Power Station, had revealed gorgeous designs for a brand new Stamford Bridge. Like Portsmouth’s docklands plans, Herzog & de Meuron were behind the drawings that would see Chelsea rehoused in a 60,000-capacity stadium by 2020. The placing photos were mentioned to be “inspired by the design of Westminster Abbey” and quoted, on the time, as costing anyplace between £500million and £1billion. Cathedrals, because it was likened to, didn’t come low-cost in a closely populated space of the capital.
There were objections however broad help for the challenge. Inside a yr, although, Abramovich had known as a halt to all of it. The crux of the issue? A visa.
This was a design for Chelsea’s new residence to be opened in 2023 (Herzog & de Meuron)
Abramovich, again in the summertime of 2018, encountered delays over a UK visa after seeing his earlier one expire and an announcement launched by Chelsea mentioned it was the “current unfavourable investment climate” that had been the set off to suspending a Stamford Bridge redevelopment that would never be revived. The relaxation is an inglorious historical past for Abramovich, who was pressured to promote Chelsea in 2021 when sanctioned by the UK authorities following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
The dream of a brand new residence has not died for Chelsea as new proprietor Todd Boehly prepares to share new plans in 2024 however there can be regrets that a stadium construct didn’t come sooner. Chelsea should make do with a stadium that homes 20,000 fewer supporters than the houses of London rivals, Tottenham, Arsenal and West Ham. Matchday revenues have flatlined at Stamford Bridge and, as of final season, meant Tottenham had a £37million annual benefit by means of the turnstiles.
Another membership with sudden regrets are Newcastle United, who’re going by means of their very own session course of on the place to go subsequent. St James’ Park, capped at 52,000, has been offered out each week because the takeover led by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund was accomplished in 2021.
Oh for one thing larger, just like the plans hatched in 1997. A planning software for a £90 million, 55,000-seater stadium on Castle Leazes, half a mile from St James’ Park, was submitted. They included a retractable roof and the choice for capability to be elevated to 70,000.
A younger fan checks out the brand new stadium plans in 1997 (Tim McGuinness/Mirrorpix/Getty Images)
“St James’ Park simply wasn’t big enough to cope with demand and the site itself had severe limitations,” says Sir John Hall, the previous proprietor of Newcastle. “We needed a world-class stadium to offer us the best chance of sustained success.”
The plans, placed on public show, were dubbed the “San Siro of the North” in a nod to the shared residence of AC Milan and Inter Milan, and included a plan to transform St James’ Park into an indoor enviornment.
Fans backed the concept however others didn’t. A petition included 36,000 names opposed constructing on the Town Moor and a public inquiry inflicting prolonged delays turned unavoidable as soon as English Heritage took an curiosity in Newcastle’s plans. By November 1997, the main target had as an alternative been turned to extending the capability of St James’ Park from 36,000 to its 52,000, as it’s right now.
Fifteen or so miles to the south, rivals Sunderland had been by means of their collapsed bid by that level. They had proposed constructing a “Wembley of the North” near the Nissan automobile manufacturing plant in 1992 and even integrated twin towers within the designs included in a postal referendum. “That was intentional on my part; I wanted it to look like Wembley,” mentioned former chairman Bob Murray.
The complicated was on account of value £75million and embrace a 40,000-capacity stadium, 12,000-seater indoor enviornment and retail park. Such was their confidence, Sunderland even submitted a bid for it to be one in all eight venues for Euro ’96. Then bang… EU funding they’d lobbied for in Brussels had been pulled.
“Just before the Euro ’96 venues were announced, I received a phone call, out of the blue, to inform me that Nissan had suddenly turned hostile towards the new stadium,” wrote Murray in his autobiography I’d Do it All Again. “A call was made to 10 Downing Street and everything changed. Suddenly it was made abundantly clear it wasn’t going to happen.”
Sunderland as an alternative went with the Stadium of Light as their subsequent residence after Roker Park, transferring in 1997. Others haven’t been so lucky.
Like Luton Town, who hope to be seeing out their ultimate years at Kenilworth Road. It is sort of 30 years since former proprietor David Kohler shared his wacky plans for a 20,000 indoor enviornment dubbed the Kohlerdome. Alas, he discovered neither the funding nor the location, which tends to be an issue.
There are numerous others, too. Bristol Rovers have spent 20 years looking for a contemporary new residence, as have Queens Park Rangers, who’ve hoped to construct a brand new stadium at close by Wormwood Scrubs. Blackpool (Whyndyke Farm), Carlisle United (Kingmoor Park), Southend United (Fossetts Farm) and Grimsby Town (Peaks Parkway) are among the many numerous different golf equipment who’ve devised formidable plans but nonetheless haven’t moved.
Just like Portsmouth. “It was very difficult to convert Fratton Park into a state-of-the-art stadium and that’s something the club needed to progress,” says Storrie, the previous chief government. “We had the fans pretty much onside but sadly it just didn’t happen.”
It was not the primary stadium challenge to stay an architect’s imaginative and prescient and won’t be the final.
Top picture: Portsmouth’s plans for a brand new stadium on the waterfront were unveiled in 2007 (Herzog & de Meuron)
Discussion about this post