Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Earlier this week, Twitch set the streaming world ablaze with new pointers that closely impacted how streamers may monetize their channels. The guidelines dictated issues like how a lot house logos may take up on the display screen, and whether or not or not these sponsorships may very well be completely displayed on the display screen in any respect. The outcry was fast, and Twitch responded by suggesting that the foundations had been being misinterpreted as a result of they had been written vaguely. Now, a day later, the livestreaming platform is strolling again the tweaks totally.
Read More: Twitch’s New Ad Rules Are Very Bad For Streamers [Update]
In a Twitter thread, the livestreaming platform mentioned that the rules had been “bad for [streamers] and bad for Twitch,” saying the intention of eradicating them instantly in order that content material creators can work with sponsors once more. The modifications, which put new ranges of restrictions on what and the way streamers collaborated with numerous manufacturers, would’ve cratered content material creators’ income.
“Yesterday, we released new Branded Content Guidelines that impacted your ability to work with sponsors to increase your income from streaming,” Twitch mentioned. “These guidelines are bad for you and bad for Twitch, and we are removing them immediately. Sponsorships are critical to streamers’ growth and ability to earn income. We will not prevent your ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors – you will continue to own and control your sponsorship business. We want to work with our community to create the best experience on Twitch, and to do that we need to be clear about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. We appreciate your feedback and help in making this change.”
Prior to strolling again the proposed modifications, the now-former pointers stipulated that branded logos may solely take up three % of the display screen. Meanwhile, burned-in movies, prerecorded adverts and commercials embedded instantly right into a livestream by way of software program comparable to OBS and Xsplit, had been prohibited. Now, nevertheless, that every one has modified, and streamers are free to do as they please, which is essential contemplating advert and branded content material are one in every of streamers’ foremost sources of income within the wake of Twitch’s abysmal 50/50 income cut up.
In Twitter DMs with Kotaku, Twitch reporter Zach Bussey defined that due to the frequent and disfavored modifications the platform makes, streamers appear to be more and more involved over Twitch’s sustainability regardless of being one of many foremost platforms for content material creators to construct an lively viewership.
“It hurts streamers, myself included, by limiting what we can do with our own streams,” Bussey mentioned. “Monetization as a live creator is exceptionally hard as fan funding can be unreliable and comes at a heavy 50% cut and ad revenue is only significant once you have quadruple-digit viewership. The best bet for creators of all sizes is working with brands directly—but that also comes with an exchange of value, and banners/overlays/custom notifications all play a part in that. That was in the crosshairs with how broadly this was written.”
Bussey went on to say that whereas there’s tons of competitors for content material creators, together with rival livestreaming platform Kick, none of them evaluate to Twitch.
“Kick, Rumble, [TikTok], YouTube, and other platforms are competing in that they offer livestreaming services, but none of them offer the kind of experience that Twitch streamers in general are looking for,” Bussey mentioned. “To move to any other option requires sacrifice—and that already sounds like it’s accepting a worse option [overall]. KIck’s baggage is obvious, and lax moderation is not what Twitch creators want. Rumble feels a bit too much like people are going to question where you were on January 6. YouTube doesn’t seem to care about their livestreaming experience—chat’s not great, crossover culture between channels doesn’t exist, and it’s just more complicated [to work with] overall. Creators are looking for greener [pastures], which all the minor competitors offer, but the interior property damage is obvious from the outside.”
Kotaku reached out to Twitch for remark.
Read More: Stranger Things Twitch Streamer Dishes On Gamer Toxicity After FaZe Clan Fallout
This fiasco is transpiring after an extended record of different misfires and unhealthy press for Twitch, together with a deepfake porn scandal that affected among the platform’s largest stars, an ongoing exodus of prime expertise, layoffs, and different unpopular platform modifications, comparable to lackluster income splits that don’t favor creators.
Despite this, as of March 2023, Twitch chief product officer Tom Verrilli mentioned “I don’t think there’s ever been a better time to start streaming on Twitch.”
Discussion about this post