Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has mentioned he was “shocked and concerned” by current allegations {that a} high BBC presenter paid an adolescent tens of hundreds of kilos for sexual photographs.
Speaking to journalists as he traveled to the NATO summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, Sunak mentioned he didn’t know the id of the accused presenter however the broadcaster had reassured him that its investigation into the case can be swift.
“They were shocking and concerning allegations,” he mentioned. “The culture secretary spoke to the director general on Sunday and is reassured the process they are taking is rigorous and will be swift. We’ve had those reassurances and that’s the right thing to do.”
The BBC has been engulfed by reviews, which first appeared in The Sun, that considered one of its high presenters paid an adolescent greater than £35,000 ($45,000) in return for express photos. It mentioned the exchanges began in 2020 when {the teenager} was aged 17.
The Sun mentioned it had been contacted by {the teenager}’s mom, who mentioned she didn’t need cost for telling her story. She advised the newspaper that she lodged a criticism with the BBC on May 19. The company launched an investigation headed by a cybercrime professional, however the presenter remained on air. The mom claimed that her baby had used the cash to fund their crack cocaine behavior. “I blame this BBC man for destroying my child’s life,” she was quoted as saying.
The presenter has since been suspended. On Tuesday, nevertheless, a lawyer representing the younger particular person on the coronary heart of the scandal wrote to BBC News describing the accusations of their shopper’s personal mom as “rubbish.”
The lawyer advised BBC News that their shopper had denied the story in correspondence with The Sun on Friday night. The younger particular person advised The Sun that there was “no truth” in its story, however the “inappropriate article” was nonetheless revealed
London’s Metropolitan Police is but to launch a proper investigation. The Met mentioned detectives had been “assessing the information discussed at the meeting” and making an attempt to determine if there may be “evidence of a criminal offence being committed.”
Discussion about this post